ESTA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IGC Pharma has a net margin of -77.57% compared to Establishment Labs Holdings's net margin of -711.67%. Establishment Labs Holdings's return on equity of -205.2% beat IGC Pharma's return on equity of -116.24%.

Establishment Labs Holdings has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 83.52%. On the other hand IGC Pharma has an analysts' consensus of $3.88 which suggests that it could grow by 1195.55%. Given that IGC Pharma has higher upside potential than Establishment Labs Holdings, analysts believe IGC Pharma is more attractive than Establishment Labs Holdings.

Establishment Labs Holdings has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.777% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IGC Pharma has a beta of 1.449, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.948%.

Establishment Labs Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IGC Pharma offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Establishment Labs Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IGC Pharma pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Establishment Labs Holdings quarterly revenues are $44.5M, which are larger than IGC Pharma quarterly revenues of $257K. Establishment Labs Holdings's net income of -$34.5M is lower than IGC Pharma's net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Establishment Labs Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IGC Pharma's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Establishment Labs Holdings is 5.10x versus 17.59x for IGC Pharma. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a net margin of -77.57% compared to Establishment Labs Holdings's net margin of -49.65%. Establishment Labs Holdings's return on equity of -205.2% beat NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's return on equity of -461.38%.

Establishment Labs Holdings has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 83.52%. On the other hand NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has an analysts' consensus of $0.85 which suggests that it could grow by 46.55%. Given that Establishment Labs Holdings has higher upside potential than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, analysts believe Establishment Labs Holdings is more attractive than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals.

Establishment Labs Holdings has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.777% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NovaBay Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.897, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.271%.

Establishment Labs Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Establishment Labs Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NovaBay Pharmaceuticals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Establishment Labs Holdings quarterly revenues are $44.5M, which are larger than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Establishment Labs Holdings's net income of -$34.5M is lower than NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Establishment Labs Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NovaBay Pharmaceuticals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Establishment Labs Holdings is 5.10x versus 0.16x for NovaBay Pharmaceuticals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Protalix BioTherapeutics has a net margin of -77.57% compared to Establishment Labs Holdings's net margin of 35.65%. Establishment Labs Holdings's return on equity of -205.2% beat Protalix BioTherapeutics's return on equity of 8.75%.

Establishment Labs Holdings has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 83.52%. On the other hand Protalix BioTherapeutics has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 408.77%. Given that Protalix BioTherapeutics has higher upside potential than Establishment Labs Holdings, analysts believe Protalix BioTherapeutics is more attractive than Establishment Labs Holdings.

Establishment Labs Holdings has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.777% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Protalix BioTherapeutics has a beta of 0.456, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.351%.

Establishment Labs Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Protalix BioTherapeutics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Establishment Labs Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Protalix BioTherapeutics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Establishment Labs Holdings quarterly revenues are $44.5M, which are larger than Protalix BioTherapeutics quarterly revenues of $18.2M. Establishment Labs Holdings's net income of -$34.5M is lower than Protalix BioTherapeutics's net income of $6.5M. Notably, Establishment Labs Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Protalix BioTherapeutics's PE ratio is 95.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Establishment Labs Holdings is 5.10x versus 4.43x for Protalix BioTherapeutics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palatin Technologies has a net margin of -77.57% compared to Establishment Labs Holdings's net margin of --. Establishment Labs Holdings's return on equity of -205.2% beat Palatin Technologies's return on equity of --.

Establishment Labs Holdings has a consensus price target of $55.00, signalling upside risk potential of 83.52%. On the other hand Palatin Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3281.64%. Given that Palatin Technologies has higher upside potential than Establishment Labs Holdings, analysts believe Palatin Technologies is more attractive than Establishment Labs Holdings.

Establishment Labs Holdings has a beta of 0.772, which suggesting that the stock is 22.777% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palatin Technologies has a beta of 0.896, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.45%.

Establishment Labs Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palatin Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Establishment Labs Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palatin Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Establishment Labs Holdings quarterly revenues are $44.5M, which are larger than Palatin Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Establishment Labs Holdings's net income of -$34.5M is higher than Palatin Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Establishment Labs Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palatin Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Establishment Labs Holdings is 5.10x versus -- for Palatin Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.